Category: Education

Should Children Of Different Abilities Be Educated Together Or Separately

blogger

Nowadays, there are two different opinions about the issue whether children with diverse abilities should be educated together or not. Some people think that they should be educated together because it benefits everyone. On the other hand, some hold the view that intelligent children should be taught separately and given special treatment. Both of the two sides are possessing their own arguments. In my opinion, I think children should be educated together, whose advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

To begin with, it’s of great value to teach children together. Only in this case, can the children grow up in a nature environment. If you separate the children into different groups and told the low-ability children why they are separated, it is unhealthy for those children to develop their character. After a long time, there must be psychological impediments to children growth.

Secondly, children of different abilities can share their experience with others and learn from one other when they are educated together. Children of various abilities and interests being educated together can create more opportunities to learn about themselves and other children. When they understand themselves and others, it’s better from them to be aware of their own defects and merits, they may try to eliminate the defects and strengthen the merits by learning from others. Undoubtedly, this helps children to grow.

In addition, learn together, children can become more cooperated and learn to get well with others. When children of different abilities work together to face a challenge, they learn to negotiate, to compromise and to reach agreement. There are all useful communicative skills for their future life.

Finally, mixed education can promote all-round development of children’s characters, while on the contrary, separate education may probably end up hindering their potential development in the future. Because one’s talent in different fields is not the same level, with mixed education, children’s talent can be developed in an integrated way.

To sum up, I think it is better to teach children of different abilities together. It helps the children to understand each other’s strengths and shortcomings, to develop their social skills, and to promote the development of their whole potential. Even though separate education may be more efficient in addressing each individual’s strength, its risk of possibly depriving the child of his potentials is so severe that it is just unacceptable.

Drivers Education How Parents Can Teach Their Children To Drive

blogger

Expectedly, it is not easy for parents to set their child freely on the road as we all know that driving is a quite scary especially that young drivers dont have enough driving experiences. However, parents should have a role in their kids drivers training as a support to a driving school instruction.

Teaching children how to drive should start with letting them know the importance of taking responsibility of their maneuver. It is through this learning that they are able to understand that they should be held responsible for their actions. They should know that driving is not a privilege but a right. While a driving school can inculcate basic driving knowledge and skills to students, parents can teach their kids in checking the oil, changing a tire and determining the right time the vehicle must be serviced. Parents should be more on the moral and emotional aspects of a drivers training which include letting them know that driving is not a hobby or a source of fun. They need to learn that responsible and safety driving is a survival means in todays times.

Parents who can have time to be with their children on the road will focus more on the applications of what they learned from a driving school. Proper parking, making turns and changing lanes with signals and obeying driving laws are among the most important techniques and learning that parents can teach their children.

When on a day for a driving practice, parents should let their child to know exactly where they are heading to. It is a smart idea to plan the driving practice with the intended route ahead of time so there will be no complications to come along the way. In the driving school, students will also have a behind the wheel training with their instructor and they can make more practices of this training with their parents.

For some people, driving can be learned easily but considering all the intricacies of the road, driving requires special skills. This is especially true when drivers have to drive through a bad weather condition such as in icy, foggy and stormy conditions. The basic driving concept in these conditions is taught in the driving school but it is possible that students are not practically exposed to all bad weather conditions during their training. Thus, as parents can be there in most of the driving periods of their kids, they can drive with them during a particular difficult road condition or at night.

Driving rules and laws vary from state to state and parents can have time to remind their kids about the restrictions of their driving rights. However, as parents spend time to teach their kids how to drive, they must make sure that they dont pass onto them their own bad driving habits. Parents should be the role models of their children so whatever their children can see from them they are likely to follow. Any driving school will also remind parents on this issue because the childrens learning will be nothing when they have to follow untoward driving practices from their parents.

How to get best school grants for quality education

blogger

Educational costs are increasing day by day. And it is becoming hard for an average person to get quality education. But for students who are interested in getting quality education like technical, mechanics, electronics or some other higher education it is easy to get it through school grants.

School grants are bit different from loans. Best part of getting education this way is that it does not require you to pay back the money you have taken for getting the education. If you are looking for jump starting your professional career and find it hard to fund education, grants is a way by which you can get your dreams come true.

In general school grants enables you to get quality education without worrying about paying back the money. These schools allow needy but talented students to get education and make their dreams come true. There are number of federal as well as private colleges and institutions that allow grant education. But as federal grants only are not enough to fund the education for all the aspiring students, it is advisable that you should look for some private institutions as well.

Various associations, institutions and organizations are available that are willing to provide the necessary help for bright students. Most of the people think that it is difficult to find these institutions but with the help of internet and search engines you can easily look for them online. As there is tough competition between the aspiring students, getting a private school grant may be a tough job. But if you are well planned and try early you can get it all the way.

First of all you should find some of the best institutions and colleges that provide you grant education. Fill out all the necessary forms and submit the application as early as possible. You have to demonstrate your financial need at the time of application, so be ready for it and prepare all your papers and documentation well in advance. Not only your financial need, but you have to also demonstrate that you are a bright student for the college by providing your unique academic records.

It is also essential that you follow all the guidelines and instructions while applying. You should also look for the limitations of the courses or programs that some of these colleges or school grants may have. This all will surely help you get best education by the best institution to enlighten your career.

Fixing What’s Wrong With Drug Education

blogger

A recent survey conducted by Join Together a program of the Boston University School of Public Health shows that few teachers believe that alcohol and other drug prevention programs work. Only 2 percent of more than 3,700 respondents felt that their school-based prevention program is effective. The report says that teachers are skeptical of the prevention programs they deliver. It goes on to say that teachers cite the need more relevant study materials, more time to do prevention, more support, and more training.

Although more training and enhanced study materials would certainly do no harm, how does this change the current destructive belief permeating our schools and our culture that drug prevention doesnt work? It is not a matter of more time, more study materials, or more training, but a need for a fundamental change in how we define prevention, set prevention goals, and understand how children adopt and reinforce healthy and unhealthy behaviors.

For three decades the United States has been waging an expensive and ineffective drug war a war more political than practical. In 1993 the federal government spent $1.7 billion on the drug war and in 1999 17.9 billion. The most ubiquitous of drug education programs DARE (Drug Awareness Resistance Education) which was started in Los Angeles in 1983 is plagued by research showing its lack of effectiveness. DARE currently costs taxpayers between 1 and 1.3 billion dollars a year. In addition, the DARE programs premise that early drug education inoculates kids from future drug use in high school is both nave and lacking a fundamental understanding of child development. In the most recent survey of adolescent drug trends conducted by Monitoring the Future, 48% of 12th graders had a drink within the last thirty days and by the time a student graduates from high school nearly half have tried an illicit drug – most likely marijuana. While recent trends in drinking and drug use show decreases in most categories, underage drinking and most notably marijuana use remain a regular experience of teenage life. What have we gotten for our money? And how does the current drug education approach reflect the reality that most teenagers face every weekend?

Teenage drug use is normalized in our culture. By the time most teens reach high school, they accept alcohol and some drug use by their peers as a common social activity. The popular notion that drinkers and drug users are outcasts and deviants conveniently ignores the reality that many teens drink including student leadership, athletes, active and involved good students. Scare tactics and exaggerated drug effects only work when your audience does not have access to other information. This generation of students has more access to information than any other generation in time. This will most likely be the case for subsequent generations. Manipulation, coercion, and exaggerated claims are not tolerated by students.

Prevention programs need to support and validate those students who choose to delay their drinking and abstain from other drugs. Programs need to help students effectively communicate concerns to friends who may be experiencing problems with their drinking and drug use and to connect those friends to helping resources in the community. Finally, prevention programs need to offer suggestions to students to minimize the risks associated with drinking and drug use such as frequency and quantity of use. Promoting risk reduction strategies no more condones drinking than the suggestion of wearing a seat belt condones speeding.

We are in a crisis right now. It is not a drug crisis, but a crisis of belief and faith. We are loosing faith in the idea that we can be effective. We are giving in to the fear that any deviation from the path of abstinence-based zero tolerance education is an endorsement of drinking. The results of giving in to fear are the growing popularity of random drug testing programs, locker searches and drug sniffing dogs. We dont need to catch more kids, but to connect with more kids. We dont need to make an example of a student, but be examples for students of healthy living and compassionate care.

The Most Common Issues in American Education

blogger

Nowadays, the problem of testing in American education is extremely important because often the existing system of tests is severely criticized and, what is more important, as a rule, this criticism is justified. In this respect, it is worthy to refer to the article by E.D. Hirsch Jr. “Using Tests Productively, where the author researches the problem of tests and their effectiveness. In fact, the author is very skeptical about the existing system of tests which, as he believe, are far from perfect.

Probably, one of the most important problems the author raises in his article is the problem of uselessness of the existing tests. To put it more precisely, E.D. Hirsch argues that both teachers and students are rather more concerned on the successful passing the tests than on the knowledge they receive. By the way, it is worthy of mention that it is not only teachers and students that are involved but the problem of effective testing also concerns the parents of students for, basically, tests are supposed to assess students academic successes and evaluate the effectiveness of their learning.

At the same time, the author underlines that often students that are practically of the same level of education, learning in the same class often show absolutely different results in testing. Hirsch mainly focuses on reading tests and, critically evaluating them, he underlines that they are quite ineffective because they are not testing comprehension strategies, as they are supposed to, but, instead, they are just testing comprehension that is obviously insufficient and ineffective.

Furthermore, the author also points out that, as a rule, students are directly prepared for the reading tests that is totally unacceptable. Instead, Hirsch insists that students should be prepared for a reading test indirectly and that is necessary to develop broad reading skills and abilities. Students should be able to work and comprehend a wide range of text on the basis of broad knowledge which is not only directly linked to reading. This knowledge should be wider, more universal involving not only literature but also art, science, logics, etc.

Naturally, on criticizing the existing system, it would be logical to offer some alternative and Hirsch underlines that content testing could be much more effective if they were specifically tied to the broad knowledge goals of a sound education in literature, science, history and arts. The broad knowledge from different spheres is essential because they form the background information which is of a paramount importance for reading comprehension. Eventually, the author concludes that such broad knowledge would increase the effectiveness of testing as well as education at large because it contributes to the progress of students academic achievements and their cognitive competence.

Obviously, the problem of testing is really important because tests actually define the whole process of education because often they are the final goal students and teachers strive to achieve and pass successfully. At the same time, the changes offered by Hirsch are really important because they help refocus education process from preparation to a particular and not perfect tests to more effective and useful acquisition of broad knowledge, skills and abilities which can not only help pass some tests but could also be useful in students personal and professional life making them really educated and intelligent personalities.